THE REBIRTH OF BODH GAYA:

Buddhism and the Making of a World Heritage Site

DAVID GEARY

 

David Geary in his book, ÔBuddhism and the Making of a World Heritage SiteÕ takes us on the journey of the transformation of Bodhgaya from a small ordinary town into a world heritage site made possible by globalized Buddhism. This book has been the product of his continuing engagement with Bodhgaya, which began with his first pilgrimage in 2002-2003 winters. (p. 7) The designation of Bodh Gaya as a World Heritage site in 2003 was a defining moment in this transformation and by 2009; Bodhgaya had eclipsed Goa as a popular tourist destination. It is a historical ethnographical study focusing mainly on the rebirth and rapid progress of Bodhgaya within the last few decades while situating it within the broader historical, economic and political transformations of modern South Asia. (p. 16)

In his book he discusses the revitalization and rediscovery of Bodhgaya as the holiest of Buddhist pilgrimage sites and the processes which have enabled it. This has also resulted in the inherent contradictions and tensions amongst the various stake holders at various levels, which have been observed in microcosmic details by the author. According to Geary, this is a study of heritage and place: heritage as a spatial practice and a contested social field that lends meaning to the place. (p. 13) The revival of Bodhgaya and other pilgrim sites in India along with the reinvention of Buddhism in the late 19th and the 20th centuries has reinforced theinter Asian Buddhist connections which first began under King AsokaÕs patronage of Buddhist missionary activities (15). The revival of the Buddhist pilgrim sites in India have acted as a platform for heritage diplomacy which has further contributed to the strengthening of the connections amongst the Asian countries across the cultural, economic and political spheres.

The first chapter opens with a detailed account of the visit of the Burmese mission to Bodhgaya which generated a lot of interest. It was after this visit that the colonial government started exercising greater control over the restoration and archeological jurisdiction of Bodhgaya. (p. 32) It was during this period that question of conflicting claims over the religious ownership of Bodhgaya also came into prominence. The author discusses the role of Sir Edwin Arnold who through his book, ÔThe Light of AsiaÕ highlighted Bodhgaya as the holiest place of the Buddhists akin to Jerusalem for the Christians and Mecca for the Muslims. (p. 41) Sir Arnold also undertook a campaign in England for the handing over the temple to the Buddhists through his writings and pleaded with the Secretary for India, Lord Cross. Then the reader is told about Angarika Dharampala, who influenced by Sir Edwin Arnold and the theosophists, decided to take up a life of renunciation for the cause of the revival of Buddhism and the reclamation of the holy land and subsequently founded the Mahabodhi Society of India in 1891. (p. 44) It was Angarika who initiated the legal proceedings for the Buddhist claim over the temple, which he used to refer as the ÔGreat CaseÕ which ultimately culminated in the Bodhgaya temple act of 1949.

As soon as one arrives at Bodhgaya from Gaya the local landscape is suddenly transformed into international. The second chapter discusses how Bodhgaya has become a global religious site, which becomes evident when one sees the representations of architectural and religious traditions of the different countries of the Buddhist world in the form of monasteries, pilgrim rest houses, and temples. (p. 63) How the Burmese, Thai and the Tibetans in exile have contributed to the internationalization of BodhgayaÕs sacred space has been analyzed here. For the Tibetan community in exile Bodhgaya is the holiest place for the performance of their rituals, the first Kalchakara Pooja having been conducted by His Holiness the Dalai Lama in 1974. The Kalchakara Pooja held in 2011-2012 was a mega international event attracting more than three lakh devotees from all over the world to Bodhgaya. To the Tibetans, apart from spirituality it provided them with a unique opportunity for cultural and social mobilization and the espousal of their nationalist cause (Sinha, 2019, p. 123).1 The worship of the Buddhist holy sites in India by the Tibetans in exile has contributed both to the revitalization of the Buddhist sites in India as well as the Internationalization of Tibetan Buddhism. (p. 79) The third chapter focuses on the establishment of numerous monasteries and temples at Bodhgaya by Asian and western Buddhist networks. However this has also led to tensions at the local level. The hotelierÕs grievance that the monasteries harm their business interests, land malpractice and involvement of the land mafia and legal and bureaucratic hurdles and complications are examples of the conflict of interest at various levels. The downfall of the Bodhgaya Math from its past majestic grandeur to its present state of decay is contrasted with the prosperity of the Bodhgaya Temple complex and the foreign monasteries, so much so that Geary speculates that its redemption may lie in its conversion to a heritage hotel. (p. 152)

The fourth chapter discusses how religious tourism has transformed Bodhgaya into a Global Bazaar. The author examines Bodhgaya from the perspective of a Bazaar, where cultural and commercial transactional encounters at the local and global level are shaping peopleÕs lives.This transformation, to a great extent has been possible due to Bodhgaya becoming a meeting ground for the cultural and religious revitalization of the Tibetan community in exile. They take up temporary residence at Bodhgaya during the winters following their religious masters and engage in economic activities for sustaining livelihood (p.159).The affluent Japanese tourists who have been visiting Bodhgaya in large numbers since the 1990s have contributed much to the business and economy of Bodhgaya. A number of matrimonial relations between local youth and Japanese girls have further strengthened the economic networks between Bodhgaya and Japan. The fifth chapter analyzes how the designation of Bodhgaya has brought pressure in form of new set of demands like that of conformity to a master plan. This has also entailed added responsibility for the state government in the form of expectation for the enlightened guardianship of the sacred site.

In the conclusion Geary is against any singular representation of Bodhgaya, considering its dynamic social and spatial environment. He questions the world heritage model and calls for alternative interpretations of Bodhgaya which has the capacity to accommodate its diverse identities and traditions. According to him ÔRegardless of world heritage, for the Buddhist pilgrims before the Bodhi tree the Mahabodhi Vihara can be anything but a Buddhist temple and should it preclude the possibility of other forms of religious and recreational politicsÕ? (p. 250)

 

Manish Sinha

Head of P.G Department of History, Magadh University, Bodhgaya

Email: manishsinha864@gmail.com

 

1. Manish Sinha, (2019).Nationalism and Spiritualism: Tibetan Nationalism in Exile in India.In Mansour, Dina and Milne, Andrew (Ed.) Negotiating Boundaries in Multicultural Societies (2nd ed.,pp.123-135) Retrieved from https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9781848882720/BP000007.xml